This Week In Linux #8: Ubuntu megashow! iphone Sync to Ubuntu 10.04, Music Store, Dell Fail

Thanks for watching! (Sorry, the video’s a bit longer than usual) My Website: www.thisweekinlinux.com My Twitter www.twitter.com My IRC Channel: #twil on irc.freenode.net Stories discussed ======================================== Ubuntu megapost – bit.ly Music by Kevin macleod of incompetech.com and royalty free from pond5.com

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to This Week In Linux #8: Ubuntu megashow! iphone Sync to Ubuntu 10.04, Music Store, Dell Fail

  1. thisweekinlinux says:

    thanks!

  2. thisweekinlinux says:

    I have to disagree. I’ve got two dell laptops at home, and they’re really decent. One’s actually from 2004-2005, and it’s still going strong. As far as their desktops, the hardware layout is a bit awkward, but they’ve still got a ton of potential.

  3. madmax10101 says:

    Dell computers are rly low-high tech… only good if you working in office ;)

  4. pritamdodeja says:

    Keep up the good work!

  5. hornetpalooza says:

    Got a really old laptop (cost me about $180 incl taxes when it was new), it got some of the first SSD disks (32G) and I boot Archlinux in less than 20 seconds. That’s a 1.2Ghz CPU and 1G RAM.
    Not sure how fast windows boots on it, but I’ve got friends with newer SSD-based laptops who get amazed at my little puppy. In particular when I show off compiz with full glitzyness, fully fluid on the built-in intel video chipset.

  6. TradieTrev says:

    an added note, Windows 7 is meant to support SSDs out of the box!

    Looking forward to the price drop, and when magnetic platter drives no longer exist

  7. TradieTrev says:

    Only tried linux based, the other I’ve tried on it was OpenSuse (with ext4)… same :D results.

    I’ve read (correct me if i’m wrong) that the ext3 and ntfs partitions {under xp anyway} can cause damage to the SSD from the excessive write / rewrites. Take the terms loosly, this is my own speculation. Pretty sure this new controller used in this drive is much better from previous SSDs

    Would love to try windows 7 on it, I’m really impressed with the improvements on SATA drives.

    Cheers

  8. thisweekinlinux says:

    TradieTrev, sounds pretty cool. Have you tried any other OSes on it to see if it’s the SSD or the way Ubuntu deals with the SSD?

  9. TradieTrev says:

    I’ve bought myself a corsair extreme x32 about 2 weeks ago, it totally shits over my 15000rpm u320 scsi drives (which are in raid 0). Any good ssd is a worthy investment, especially when it’s running your os

    As for loading time I was gob smacked when there was no ubuntu symbol, one flick of the start up ubuntu bar then the desktop (there’s your 15 secs from grub)! Not bad for a 3yr old computer. Crazy fast

  10. thisweekinlinux says:

    that’s actually a really good point. I’ve definitely not bothered to invest in SSD’s yet, but with the performance out of some of them, I could see Ubuntu going to the 15 second mark.

  11. etank5 says:

    The fast booting news could be on systems with solid state drives. Not sure though. A faster boot time would be awesome.

  12. davexunit says:

    hoping that ubuntu 10.04 will be awesome! *crosses fingers*

  13. thisweekinlinux says:

    I’m sort of split in my opinion here… generally the people who would be buying desktops aren’t the ones who would buy a Dell desktop, or an Ubuntu desktop. They’d either build it themselves or buy a Win PC and reinstall (because of the price difference).
    Either way it looks like a step backward from the outside.

  14. arthursucks says:

    I can’t really condemn Dell. Perhaps I’m mistaken but no one really buys desktop computers anymore outside of the business world.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>