Sabayon Linux Beryl

Sabayon Linux 64Bits v3.2 with beryl 0.1.3 some effects on desktop

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

25 Responses to Sabayon Linux Beryl

  1. jimmypictures says:

    you=sucker
    all linux users=home power users and developers

  2. greenglassofwater says:

    right click the panel go to properties and under apperance there is a bar that goes from solid on the left to transparent on the right

  3. mendozairis says:

    How do you make the panel transparent?

  4. alexmassacre123 says:

    i hate the kde desktop gui.. but any ways nice work.. you must have a powerful graphics card

  5. Chitenza says:

    Yea, its a bit of a learning curve… but once you complete it, it becomes much easier to get by… its prolly best if you have a simple book or somebody to help you get familiar.

  6. Chitenza says:

    Holy shit… Thats beautiful is this what Im missing out on by not downloading and enabling compiz/compiz -fusion? Does the startup take a performance hit if i do enable it… Im using Ubuntu by the way.

  7. roketboyd says:

    not really… i use linux but im not a dev…

  8. blaz3y09 says:

    no GUI = Graphical User Interface.

  9. riepervideo says:

    linux = Developer
    Windows= user
    nice distro congratz for your look

  10. milodaman2 says:

    It just takes time getting used to it.

    Ubuntu is built off a strong core (Glibc). It processes big things faster. You can officially go to Adobe Premiere in 2 seconds while in XP or Vista it will take me around 15 seconds to load it, then another 5 for it to load up the file screen. And i have a 2.5 ghz intel core 2 duo.

  11. unfairlyowned says:

    Command line >>>>>>>>>> GUI

  12. Horihiraku says:

    Linux is not for everybody, sorry. I tried Ubuntu and is good. But you have to open the comand window to do most of the things. That’s not time saving.

  13. jeansl10 says:

    is there a program for windows that does that cube thing?

  14. lolmgshoes says:

    Why are people arguing about Linux vs Windows on this video, it’s fucking retarded. This video was made to demonstrate Beryl on Sabayon Linux, not as a war ground for debates about Linux vs Windows.

  15. lolmgshoes says:

    What do you mean? Linux applications are compatible with Linux…

  16. Civilization1 says:

    but then you can gain root on a mac in 20 min 0.o

  17. abaddonic says:

    i woudlnt try this. most things are not compatible.

  18. N3sser07 says:

    never comp linux withe windows linux is far more better

  19. Glennormothra says:

    There were two flaws in which a person could gain root in the past year. A priv escalation bug, and a bug in SSH and SSL.

  20. nEmoGrinder says:

    i’m just saying when Microsoft has a flaw, it is huge. Complete, unavoidable remote access is a HUGE problem. The biggest problem I think of with linux was the SSL key generation issue, and that was fixed far more promptly than the time between service packs.

    Anyways, it’s true all OS’s have issues, they just seem to be more apparent on windows, not because of the frequency (which is unfair since microsoft has much larger market share) but in severity.

    Hopefully Windows 7 will be better.

  21. Glennormothra says:

    So is mmm a copy of Linux from one year ago with no updates. You are a true Lintard. What is your fucking point? You cannot compare an old version of Windows with recent Linux.

    Compare Linux to Vista. You will see they are equal in security.

  22. nEmoGrinder says:

    But many of the exploits in Windows are quite dangerous. A copy of XP with service pack one is susceptible to being completely overtaken by a hacker using a remote access exploit.

  23. nEmoGrinder says:

    there are many many stable Linux builds. The reason why most you download are unstable (like ubuntu) is the fact that they are constantly trying to be on the edge of technology, sacrificing stability for new technology.

    Once Windows finally decides to break their useless backwards compatibility and get rid of the registry system, I will go back. Windows as an OS isn’t terribly insecure, but many of microsoft’s applications are not, namely IE, creating a dangerous situation.

  24. snakedevirgo says:

    C) i never say it was… they are UNIX based…
    D) not agreed at all… Linux is super stable… if your application crashes you don’t have restart the PC like sometimes (a lot) happens in windows. You just open a terminal kill the process and presto!
    E) probably the best reason that Linux is better the win is the resource administration. Any program that is for Linux and windows!!! the Linux version is always faster! try netbeans or maya.
    F) Linux is Free and almost every application is free!

  25. Glennormothra says:

    A) I am 22; I just put 17 to save embarrassing YouTube situations around my very conservative parents. You see things are different in asia.

    B) The point is Windows is very comparable to Linux in uptime. The average uptime is less but this is likely because of administrator decisions rather than the OS.

    C) Linux is not UNIX, and just because it is UNIX does not mean it is more secure as Windows Server 2007 is more secure than OS X.

    D) Linux is fucking unstable on the desktop.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>